Report this comment
  • "I understand why many who have access to a car may not want to spend money on subsidising or promoting public transport. The problem is that large sections of the community don't have access to a car. 56% of the 18-24 year olds don't have a driving licence, let alone a car and this figure is increasing. We have an ageing population many of who can no longer drive or relied on a now deceased partner to drive them around.
    There's a lot said on these pages that appears to stereotype the majority of unemployed as scroungers. Yet how can they get to work or afford to pay a large slice of their minimum wage on transport costs if they don't have access to transport. Employers too need access to a workforce if they are to grow, prosper and provide the goods and services we all need.
    I'm sure savings can be made and fares increased to sustain some of the services, but I do think the bigger picture needs to be considered when considering the broader benefits of having a well functioning public transport system.
    After all, the vast majority of us will be without access to a car at some stage in our life.
    If more used public transport would it not also help to alleviate the traffic congestion and parking problems that many see as a major problem in "The Faithful City'?"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Spend more promoting public transport in Worcestershire, says councillor

Evesham Journal: The launch of the park and ride service at Sixways - which is now under threat The launch of the park and ride service at Sixways - which is now under threat

MORE taxpayers’ money should be spent on promoting public transport, according to a Worcestershire politician.

Councillor Matthew Jenkins, from the Green Party, says he fears that services like Worcester’s park and rides are in great danger unless they are looked at more positively.

He says Worcestershire County Council’s Conservative leadership must start to look at the current public transport network as an asset, rather than a liability.

It comes after the council revealed plans to scrap a £3 million public transport subsidy from September, putting 88 bus services and park and rides at Persdiswell and Sixways at risk.

On the Perdiswell park and ride service 340,000 journeys are now made a year compared to 450,000 back in 2008.

Coun Jenkins said: “The figures show people are out there but if you put them off using the service, they won’t come back.

“There are a lot more potential customers out there but we’ve got to tempt them back into it again.

“It’s the council’s responsibility to not only provide an over-arching vision for how people travel, but encourage them to use public transport.

Related links

“My concern is that if we don’t promote the benefits of it, other people won’t – pollution from cars is a major cause of pollution and illness.

“If we don’t worry about this nobody else will.”

The council is under huge financial pressure and needs to slash £98 million from spending by 2017, including well over 600 job losses.

It includes ending the public transport funding, in the hope private operators can take on both park and ride sites in Worcester and some of the subsidised routes.

If routes can be saved it is likely to mean higher fares, less frequent services, or both.

Councillor John Smith, the cabinet member responsible for highways and transportation, said: “We don’t want anything to go, we just have to make them commercially viable and they’ve got to be used by the public.

“What he says may well be true but we’ve got to make a decision.”


Related articles:

 

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree