CALL it lek, kwanza, pulas, birr, bututs, ringit, kip, at, avos, tambala, khoums, won, jun, chon, mongo, dong, ngwee or stotinki, there is no word so silly that some country, somewhere, hasn't used it for a unit of currency.
It's almost a relief to turn to Guinea, where 100 Cory make ... yes, one Syli.
Thinking commendably Green, the Royal Bank of Scotland reduces all its worn, dirty and damaged banknotes to porridge-like granules for use as fertiliser. Which only proves that, if money doesn't grow on trees, at least trees can grow on money.
In Nigeria, banknotes don't even have to be turned into compost before bacteriological breakdown sets in.
Tests at the University of Lagos revealed that naira banknotes provided a home for up to 1500 bacteria, including germs which caused styes and gastro-enteritis.
The United States Treasury recently issued 800 million new $100 bills. Nothing to do with nasty germs threatening the nation; merely that forgers have become so expert that 15 out of every million $100 notes are now fakes.
The new issue will take all the fun out of money-changing in Los Angeles. Drugs are so prevalent in LA that nearly every $100 note - the favourite method of ''snorting'' - is impregnated with cocaine.
Recycling Ukraine's valueless paper money wasn't so easy. Officials decided to pulp 35 tons of karbovantsi notes and turn them into toilet rolls.
Oh dear. They didn't realise that the red, blue and green pigment in the banknotes wasn't degradable ... and that the loo paper left everyone with a rear like a Jackson Pollock painting.
One final word of warning. The Russian mint recently issued a coin with 100 roubles stamped on one side ... and 50 roubles on the other.
Never plays heads or tails with a Muscovite.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article