The arrival of an advance party of the Chinese army in Hong Kong today coincides with heightened protests over the removal of civil liberties when China's re-absorption of Hong Kong is made final on July 1. The objections seem rather late but are none the less welcome. The future leader of Hong Kong appointed by Beijing, Mr Tung Chee-hwa, announced plans to restrict public protests and to ban foreign funding for local political groups. These measures are aimed directly at the democracy movement and its leader, the admirable Martin Lee, who was in Washington last Friday, apparently making a favourable impression on President Clinton.
The significance of Mr Lee's visit is considerable, especially as it stands in stark contrast to Mr Tung's cancellation of his own visit on the dubious grounds that he was too busy. Mr Lee's visit seems to have strengthened Washington's interest in Hong Kong and the impression is heightened by Mr Clinton's warning to Beijing that the agreement negotiated between Britain and China on Hong Kong's future for the next 50 years must be honoured to the letter.
If Mr Lee is doing well Mr Tung is doing rather badly, and deservedly so. Banning foreign money reaching Hong Kong political groups was presented as a means of stopping foreigners involving themselves in domestic politics. Yet Mr Tung has had to admit that he donated #50,000 to Conservative Party coffers in the weeks before the 1992 General Election. This may be embarrassing for the Tories but it is evidence of utter hypocrisy on Mr Tung's part.
None of it means that the efforts to retain the civil rights which are under threat from Mr Tung's proposals will succeed, but at the very least Mr Lee's position has been strengthened somewhat and the Chinese leadership may proceed a little more cautiously.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article