THE contest for leadership of the Scottish Tory Scottish parliamentary candidates burst into life yesterday as the Left's champion Struan Stevenson pulled out of the race for Holyrood altogether and threw his weight behind David McLetchie.
Meanwhile, the campaign of former Ayr MP Phil Gallie was up and running, with his supporters claiming there is strong support for a contested leadership election and that they have already secured more than enough nominations to make it a real contest.
Speaking to The Herald from Tenerife where he is currently on holiday, Mr Gallie said that the Scottish Tories needed to be more aggressive. The time for apologising was over and the party must get up off its knees. He was looking forward to ''verbally roughing up'' their political opponents.
Mr Gallie said that he would be resigning from his job with Scottish Enterprise when he returned from holiday next week. He said it was only fair to the company to quit now that he had announced his intention of running for the leadership. He said this would also free him to concentrate on winning the Ayr seat at Holyrood.
As widely forecast, Mr Stevenson, who is a former Westminster candidate, said that he had decided to seek election to the European Parliament rather than Holyrood. He said it was of vital importance that Scotland's interests were well represented in Brussels and that communications between Holyrood and the EU were maintained at the highest possible level.
Mr McLetchie, who is an Edinburgh lawyer and like Mr Gallie is identified as being on the Right of the party, said he was delighted to have Mr Stevenson's backing, but this was tinged with regret that he would not be standing for Holyrood.
Mr McLetchie, the candidate for Edinburgh Pentlands, rejected the idea of an East/West split in the leadership contest, stressing he had the support, not only of Struan Stevenson, who is former leader of Kyle and Carrick Council, but also Glasgow lawyer Annabel Goldie and Glasgow City councillor John Young. He already had around 25 nominations from approved parliamentary candidates.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article