COMPENSATION for the victims of the split-capital investment trust scandal has been delayed until some time in the new year, the company set up to handle the fund said yesterday.
Fund Distribution Limited had promised "an offer before Christmas" to the 40,000 apparently eligible applicants for compensation from the [GBP]144m fund. It was set up voluntarily by the industry after tortuous negotiations with the Financial Services Authority ended in a deal last Christmas Eve.
However, FDL said yesterday that first distribution "has been deferred to the NewYear and will not be available before the end of January 2006".
It went on: "FDL is in the final stages of validating applications and is currently carrying out quality assurance checks on nearly 40,000 applications. There are still a number of applications with queries outstanding however, and in these instances, FDL is working closely with registrars, nominees, brokers and investors to resolve them.
"FDL is allowing as long as possible for this process, but in the interests of all applicants it must draw a line under outstanding queries so that it can proceed to make first distribution offers.
"All applicants should have received at least one letter plus a reminder letter, explaining what information is still needed, before any potentially eligible application is rejected. Further reminders and rejection letters will be sent early in the NewYear."
Mike Ellis, fund commissioner, commented: "While we had planned to announce an offer before Christmas, FDL must be satisfied that it has completed all of the necessary final checks before announcing the offer. It is simply the case that this process is taking longer than expected."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article