TOO little too late it may have been, but England finally came good
yesterday when they won the sixth and final Cornhill Insurance Test
against Australia at The Oval by 161 runs with 13.5 overs to spare.
When all is said and done, the victory does serve merely to reduce the
scale of the series' defeat to 4-1, but it also acts as a high note at
the end of a dispiriting summer.
And after a run of nine defeats in 10 Tests and 18 matches without a
win over Australia stretching back to December 1986, any win is a cause
for English celebration. A final day crowd of more than 10,000 did just
that when man-of-the-match Angus Fraser took the final wicket, trapping
Shane Warne leg before.
With match figures of eight for 131, it was a triumphant return to
Test cricket for Fraser after a two-and-a-half year absence with a
career-threatening hip injury. And the win meant that he, along with
nine of his team-mates -- Graham Gooch is the exception -- tasted
victory over Australia for the first time.
Cynics will say England's win was achieved not only through Fraser,
but also thanks to Jamaican Devon Malcolm and Welshman Steve Watkin, who
recorded Test best figures, and that it was a hollow win given that the
series already was decided, with Australia's play often mixing an
end-of-term approach with the mannerisms of a jaded side.
But captain Mike Atherton, tasting victory in only his second match in
charge on the day he was confirmed as captain for the West Indies tour,
outlined its importance.
''It's a real morale booster, and nice to have young lads coming into
the side in a winning atmosphere.'' he said.
To his credit, Allan Border, in his final Test in England offered no
excuses, and paid Atherton's men the compliment of saying his side had
been outplayed.
And so they were, with England always looking capable of achieving the
difficult task of dismissing Australia in a day on a good surface.
True, England were helped by some curious umpiring decisions --
Michael Slater being given out caught off his forearm, while Border
himself appeared unhappy when given caught behind in the first over of
the afternoon session.
But Australia also did themselves no favours by playing some suicidal
shots -- or in David Boon's case non-shots as he padded up to his first
ball.
Mark Waugh, Ian Healy, the victim of a superb running catch by Matthew
Maynard from first slip, and Merv Hughes, all lost their wickets
miscuing hook shots. It was no wonder Australia were reduced to 148 for
eight by tea.
The match still had a twist in the tail. Mark Waugh and Border in
adding 62 for the fourth wicket, after Watkin had taken three wickets in
two overs in the morning session, and Steve Waugh and Hughes who stayed
together for 21 overs, proved survival was far from impossible.
And it was borne out by the resistance of Warne and Paul Reiffel, the
latter surviving for 75 minutes after having been struck on the helmet
by a Malcolm delivery.
The ninth wicket pair, who came together just before tea, slogged 30
in two overs, determined to go down fighting.
But gradually, they realised they could survive and held up England
for 18 overs before Reiffel was caught and bowled by Fraser with 18
overs to go and Warne fell four overs later.
Atherton's next task will now be to sit down and pick a side for the
West Indies in three weeks' time. But whether Gooch will be joining that
party this winter remains open to question.
England's man of the series, with 673 runs this summer, has been head
and shoulders above his peers, and although he has said previously he is
unavailable, there is a suggestion he might be having a rethink. And
Atherton would certainly welcome his presence.
But he added: ''It would be nice from a playing point of view for him
to be there as he's an outstanding player of quick bowling. But unless
his heart is in it, it wouldn't be right for him to tour.''
Border, however, concluded that England's prospects this winter would
largely depend on Gooch's presence in the Caribbean. Scoreboard:
ENGLAND -- First Innings 380
Second Innings 313.
AUSTRALIA -- First Innings 303
Second Innings, overnight 1 for no wicket
Second Innings continued
M J Slater c Stewart b Watkin 12
M A Taylor b Watkin 8
D C Boon lbw b Watkin 0
M E Waugh c Ramprakash b Malcolm 49
A R Border c Stewart b Malcolm 17
S R Waugh lbw b Malcolm 26
I A Healy c Maynard b Watkin 5
M G Hughes c Watkin b Fraser 12
P R Reiffel c & b Fraser 42
S K Warne lbw b Fraser 37
T B A May not out 4
Extras 17. Total 229
Fall of wickets: 1-23, 2-23, 3-30, 4-92, 5-95, 6-106, 7-142, 8-143,
9-217.
Bowling: Malcolm 20-3-84-3; Watkin 25-9-65-4; Fraser 19.1-5-44-3; Such
9-4- 17-0; Hick 8-3-11-0.
THE DISMAL TALE OF TEST FAILURES.
---------------------------------
ENGLAND had gone 18 Tests without a victory against the Australians,
starting in Sydney in January, 1987, before yesterday's win: The sad
statistics:
1, Sydney, 1987lost 55 runs.
2, Sydney, 1988drawn.
3, Leeds, 1989lost 210 runs.
4, Lord's, 1989lost 6 wkts.
5, Birmingham, 1989drawn.
6, Manchester, 1989lost 9 wkts.
7, Nottingham, 1989lost inns and 180 runs.
8, The Oval, 1989drawn.
9, Brisbane, 1990lost 10 wkts.
10, Melbourne, 1990lost 8 wkts.
11, Sydney, 1991drawn.
12, Adelaide, 1991drawn.
13, Perth, 1991lost 9 wkts.
14, Manchester, 1993lost 179 runs.
15, Lord's, 1993lost inns and 62 runs.
16, Nottingham, 1993drawn.
17, Leeds, 1993lost inns and 148 runs.
18, Birmingham, 1993lost 8 wkts.
It had been 13 months since England last won a Test match, defeating
Pakistan by six wickets at Headingley on July 26, 1992. Their last win
against Australia, by an innings and 14 runs, came at Melbourne on
December 28, 1986. Here is the record of England's 10-Test sequence
without a victory -- and four of them were by an innings and more --
starting at The Oval last August:
1, v Pakistan, The Ovallost 10 wkts.
2, v India, Calcuttalost 8 wkts.
3, v India, Madraslost inns and 22 runs.
4, v India, Bombaylost inns and 15 runs.
5, v Sri Lanka, Colombolost 5 wkts.
6, v Australia, Manchesterlost 179 runs.
7, v Australia, Lord'slost inns and 62 runs.
8, v Australia, Nottinghamdrawn.
9, v Australia, Leedslost inns and 148 runs.
10, v Australia, Birminghamlost 8 wkts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article