PREVIOUS French Higher exams have been criticised for problems with the taped listening passage, with complaints about the speed, pronunciation - and even the sound quality.
This year, reviewers were pleased with that section of the exam, which pupils coped with well.
Alison Harvey, teacher of French at St Kentigern's Academy in West Lothian, said: "I have complained in the past, but the listening section was good this year.
"The quality of the recording was better and the accent and pace was fine. You don't want pupils to be put off."
Marie Fogg, principal teacher of languages at Trinity High School, in Renfrewshire, also liked the listening passage, which she said was well-paced and clear.
Overall, she thought the Higher was a good, fair test, although she did raise doubts over the directed writing, which she said took a different format this year.
"Pupils were surprised by the bullet points and that is not how previous papers appeared, but, candidates would have been fine," she said. "Examiners had the level of difficulty pretty well spot on in the last few years and, while candidates have not found it easy, they are comfortable with the paper."
Liz Bertram, head of modern languages at Hutchesons' Grammar School in Glasgow, said both teachers and pupils thought the exam was fine. "It was a fair and accessible paper with a good range of vocabulary. The translation was short, and tough in places, but the French itself was not too complex, although choosing the right English words was a little bit trickier."
Evlyne Verneau-Conlan, principal teacher of French at Stewarton Academy in East Ayrshire, was disappointed with the Higher paper. "I thought it was a difficult exam," she said.
"The directed writing was not as predictable as it has been and related more to the world of work than normal, which we don't cover. Some pupils would have struggled with the vocabulary. The bullet points were also unpredictable and pupils were not very happy at all. Overall, it was not an easy exam and, compared to previous years, it was too hard and not fair on those of lower abilities."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article