Blitz on pay saves taxpayers £1.3m (From Evesham Journal)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting EJ NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Blitz on pay saves taxpayers £1.3m
4:20pm Wednesday 3rd October 2012 in News By Tom Edwards
Blitz on pay saves taxpayers £1.3m
A CULL on terms and conditions for council workers in Worcestershire has saved taxpayers £1.3 million, it has emerged.
An attack on sick pay and reductions in working hours for county council employees is paying off, according to the authority’s Conservative leadership.
Staff agreeing to take three days’ unpaid leave a year has saved £400,000 and £300,000 has been clawed back by withholding sick pay for people off work for three days or less.
Another £300,000 has been shaved off the wage bill by appointing all new recruits on 35 hours a week instead of 37. And £300,000 has been saved by inviting workers to “purchase” extra annual leave at an agreed daily rate.
The county council managed to get agreement for the changes from Unison last year, despite representatives saying it was an “attack” on terms and conditions.
Early estimates suggest the measures will save about £2 million by the end of the financial year.
Councillor Adrian Hardman, county council leader, said: “I know these changes were controversial at the time, but the trade unions did take a pragmatic approach to it.
“What it has done is release cash that we can spend on frontline services, so it has made a difference.
“It was a very helpful manoeuvre for this council.”
At the time of the changes, bosses also decided to reduce the mileage rates available to employees, so workers with more environmentally-friendly cars got the best deals.
Early indications suggest that particular measure will save up to £500,000 by next April, in addition to the £2 million.
Jim Price, secretary of Worcestershire’s Unison branch, said: “There was quite a lot of discontent and resignation at the time but many members felt if they didn’t agree to it, it would be imposed on them.
“Many workers go beyond their hours and to some extent, the council has been relying on a lot of goodwill.
“Demands on our services have not reduced. If you look at areas like social care the staff simply can’t clock on and off just like that.”
Comments(8)
Guy66
says...
4:43pm Wed 3 Oct 12
Landy44
says...
4:46pm Wed 3 Oct 12
I'm sure they can do significantly better given the size of their budget.
It does make me laugh though - who is running the council? The unions?
darren3o
says...
4:56pm Wed 3 Oct 12
denon
says...
7:05pm Wed 3 Oct 12
mayall8808
says...
7:40pm Wed 3 Oct 12
Its about time some of the £100,000 per annum plus managers were weeded out? as thats where a lot of money could be saved too.
green49
says...
7:52pm Wed 3 Oct 12
Where are these managers heads? taxpayer's again footing the bill for this debacle, it just shows the contempt they have for there workers and the general public.
WilkoJ
says...
8:59pm Wed 3 Oct 12
skychip
says...
9:09pm Wed 3 Oct 12
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with