Council suffers massive court ‘defeat’

STORED: STORED:

WYCHAVON District Council has suffered a “crushing defeat” in court after trying to claim nearly £2million in a criminal compensation case – and winning only £5,750.

Businessman John Bruce, of Wadborough Hall Farm, Pershore, pleaded guilty at a magistrates court hearing in September 2011 to breaching a planning order by keeping goods vehicles for sale on a one-acre site in Crabbe Yard, Crabbe Lane, Pershore.

The site had planning permission for use as a builder’s yard, but Wychavon enforcement officers thought they had seen 151 goods vehicles being kept on the site from January 11 to September 29 last year, in breach of the order.

The figure was reduced to 101 on agreement at the start of the proceeds of crime application hearing at Worcester Crown Court last week.

Wychavon applied for a confiscation order totalling about £1.9 million, based – it said – on financial information disclosed by Mr Bruce and information provided by a financial investigator.

Bruce gave evidence about each vehicle and Judge John Cavell ruled three had breached the order.

One was a car worth £250, the second a pedestrian road roller worth £750 and the third a truck worth £4,750 – totalling £5,750. This was the amount awarded to the council.

Richard Adams, for Bruce, said it was a “crushing defeat” for Wychavon.

“When the proceedings started, they were seeking 1.67 million,” he said.

“This was then increased to £1.9 million. They have recovered £5,750, 0.29 per cent of the amount they were seeking.”

It was a “cavalier prosecution,” he said.

Tim Moores, for the council, said it believed there was a strong case, but admitted that the council had not succeeded in the way it had anticipated.

The council imposed a planning order on Bruce’s site, and later when Bruce contravened the order, the council took it to magistrates court – and Wychavon then applied to the crown court for the £1.9million order.

Bruce said: “If I had lost that amount, it would have finished my business,” he said, adding he was planning to pursue the council for his “substantial” legal costs.

Bruce was fined £1,500 for the original breach of the enforcement order.

A Wychavon spokeswoman said: “We took advice from a barrister, who confirmed there were genuine grounds for pursuing this application. It was granted, however it was only for £5,750.”

Comments(6)

spider666 says...
1:09pm Fri 12 Oct 12

So how much has this fiasco cost wychavon inhabitants----would someone from the council care to comment ----hmmmmm could be waiting a while.

mr_wilson15 says...
1:59pm Fri 12 Oct 12

spider666 wrote:
So how much has this fiasco cost wychavon inhabitants----would someone from the council care to comment ----hmmmmm could be waiting a while.
Well the council was apparently only acting on advice from a Barrister. This should be deemed as professional advice, and that is a horrific miscalculation on his part. He should bear some sort of professional responsibility for his part in this.

thecigarman says...
2:09pm Fri 12 Oct 12

They the council are of course going to blame some1 else in this case the barrister, it softens the blow against them, it should of never been bought to court, it cost a lot more in legal fees than was awarded. Another waste of taxpayers hard earnt cash. go and sit and watch some of the cases in any crown court on any day and you,ll see the crap that is being bought to court, civil and criminal. The uk system is loseing it. The police are chaseing the wrong 1s and not investigating poperley.

mr_wilson15 says...
4:02pm Fri 12 Oct 12

thecigarman wrote:
They the council are of course going to blame some1 else in this case the barrister, it softens the blow against them, it should of never been bought to court, it cost a lot more in legal fees than was awarded. Another waste of taxpayers hard earnt cash. go and sit and watch some of the cases in any crown court on any day and you,ll see the crap that is being bought to court, civil and criminal. The uk system is loseing it. The police are chaseing the wrong 1s and not investigating poperley.
Exactly. It is the system. Don't blame the council.

The article says the council based the case on "financial information disclosed by Mr Bruce and information provided by a financial investigator." and that it was "acting on advice from a Barrister".

Don't bring your personal experience of misgivings into the scenario, look at what's laid out by the article!

mayall8808 says...
3:13pm Sat 13 Oct 12

Its about time we all had some come back on the legal system, if a Barrister did give advice and it is not right then they should stand the cost as they charge stupid amounts in fees.

In my experience when i had to take some Barristers advice i thought it was too middle of the road and just edging his bets so i sacked him and did it myself, i won.

mayall8808 says...
3:15pm Sat 13 Oct 12

Wychavon must have legal people so how did it get to a Barrister? surley common sense must come into reason sometimes as its taxpayers money again being spent.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree