LABOUR was ''splitting apart'' on Europe, Foreign Secretary Douglas
Hurd claimed yesterday in what his Labour Shadow Gerald Kaufman gently
described as one of his occasional forays into party politics.
It was unfortunate for Mr Hurd that, as he made this point, Mr Norman
Tebbit ambled into the Chamber and planted himself down in the place
from where the evening before he had raised the banner of revolt.
The usually waspish Mr Kaufman, in emollient mood -- it is hard not to
find Mr Hurd agreeable -- advised the Foreign Secretary to return to the
soporific diplomat-speak which made the House so fond of him.
Mr Hurd took this in good part and Maastricht was largely forgotten as
he learnedly disputed with Mr Kaufman and Mr Denis Healey whether Russia
should automatically inherit the expiring Soviet Union's UN Security
Council seat and veto.
The Labour side for once urged delay and may well be right, given the
state of Mr Yeltsin's heart and the disposition of his deputy.
Tory MPs were distracted trying to work out if the previously
announced adhesion of Mr Bill Walker to the Tebbit camp meant that the
ensuing vote was not to be a walkover for the Government.
Nervous glances were cast towards the seat where Mrs Thatcher had sat
the previous evening nodding approval of Mr Tebbit's heretical
sentiments.
She was not occupying it yesterday, but the more credulous may have
feared that, like Banquo's ghost, she might unnervingly materialise if
not there then, even more horribly, in the Labour lobby.
Mr Hurd bravely claimed that Mr Kinnock had repeatedly been
''torpedoed'' by Ministers during his speech the day before. However, as
the speech has now past into Labour mythology as a masterpiece, at least
until the result of the next General Election is known, he was howled
down.
The life in fact had gone out of the great debate. Weary MPs gave the
impression of just wanting to vote and get away for Christmas.
Sir Geoffrey Howe did provide a warm if, naturally, low-key welcome of
the kind Mr Major was looking for. Mr Heath, having apparently concluded
that Mr Major had not been quite communitaire enough for his taste
decided, Mr Major not being Mrs Thatcher, not to make an issue of it and
did not speak.
Dr David Owen observed the proceedings for a while but, exhausted
perhaps by having told us so much about his life and opinions in
autobiography, denied or spared the House a survey of Maastricht.
A formerly keen European, Sir Peter Blaker confessed that his
enthusiasm for the Community had been modified by its eagerness to
legislate about such matters as the flavour of the British potato crisp.
''That is not federalism. It is socialism,'' he said indignantly.
A few Opposition MPs looked as if he had provided previously lacking
justification for their party's recent conversion to Europe. Can policy
turn on the flavour of a potato crisp? If it is a socialist crisp, it
possibly can.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article