DIVORCE laws are being overhauled after a Broadway woman battled all the way to the Supreme Court and lost.

Calls for reform intensified after Tini Owens lost the court battle after failing to persuade a family court judge to allow her to divorce her husband of 40 years, Hugh Owens.

Mrs Owens argued she was unhappy in her marriage, which she claimed had broken down irretrievably. But Mrs Owens’s husband, Hugh Owens, did not agree to divorce, and the Supreme Court ruled against her, meaning she must remain married until 2020.

Earlier this week it was announced the 50-year-old divorce laws will be overhauled under Government plans designed to end a “blame game” faced by couples seeking to end their marriage.

Justice Secretary David Gauke confirmed new legislation would be introduced after a consultation revealed support for reforms of the existing fault-based system. Currently in England and Wales, unless someone can prove there was adultery, unreasonable behaviour or desertion, the only way to obtain a divorce without their spouse’s agreement is to live apart for five years.

The proposed new arrangements will keep “irretrievable breakdown” of a marriage as the sole grounds for divorce.

But, rather than having to provide evidence relating to behaviour or separation, divorcing spouses will be required to make a statement that the marriage has broken down.

The government’s decision to introduce a ‘no-fault’ divorce will help to cut some of the conflict from what can be a highly stressful experience.

The ability of a husband or wife to contest a divorce – used in under two per cent of cases – will be scrapped under the shake-up.

The existing two-stage process, in which a decree nisi is followed by a decree absolute, will be retained under the proposed new system. It will introduce a six-month minimum period that must elapse between the lodging of a petition to the divorce being made final.

The government is also planning to make it possible for couples to make joint divorce applications, alongside the current option for one party to initiate the process.

Mr Gauke said: “While we will always uphold the institution of marriage, it cannot be right that our outdated law creates or increases conflict between divorcing couples.

“So I have listened to calls for reform and firmly believe now is the right time to end this unnecessary blame game for good.”

Aidan Jones, chief executive of charity Relate, welcomed the “much-needed” changes.

He said: “The outdated fault-based divorce system led parting couples to apportion blame, often resulting in increased animosity and making it harder for ex-partners to develop positive relationships as co-parents.

“While divorce isn’t a decision that people tend to take lightly, we do support the extension of the minimum timeframe which will allow more time to reflect, give things another go if appropriate, and access support such as relationship counselling or mediation.”

Christina Blacklaws, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, said the current system “exacerbates tensions” between couples.

“The government’s decision to introduce a ‘no-fault’ divorce will help to cut some of the conflict from what can be a highly stressful experience," she said.

“For separating parents, it can be much more difficult to focus on the needs of their children when they have to prove a fault-based fact against their former partner. Introducing a ‘no-fault’ divorce will change the way couples obtain a divorce – for the better.”

Last year, 118,000 people petitioned for divorce in England and Wales. Parallel changes will be made to the law governing the dissolution of a civil partnership.

READ MORE: Broadway woman who says marriage is unhappy loses Supreme Court battle